FP Bulgaria issue 1 (30)

February 2010

The first online only issue of FP Bulgaria.

view all FP publications

After Europe (in Bulgarian)

2017

Author(s): Ivan Krastev

The Bulgarian edition of "After Europe", published by Obsidian Publishing House.

After Europe

2017

Author(s): Ivan Krastev

In this provocative book, renowned public intellectual Ivan Krastev reflects on the future of the European Union—and its potential lack of a future.

Democracy Disrupted

2014

Author(s): Ivan Krastev

view all book publications

Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities. Bulgaria Country Report

05 June 2017

Author(s): Ruzha Smilova

Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe: Challenges and Opportunities Edited by Peter Vandor, Nicole Traxler, Reinhard Millner, and Michael Meyer. ERSTE Foundation publication

Democratic Innovation and the Politics of Fear: 25 Lessons from Eastern Europe

05 June 2017

Author(s): Daniel Smilov

Daniel Smilov's contribution to The Governance Report 2017, published by Oxford University Press

Political Finance in East, Central and South East Europe & Central Asia

Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns: A Handbook on Political Finance © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2014, 16 July 2015

Author(s): Daniel Smilov

The New European Disorder

ECFR, 11 November 2014

Ivan Krastev and Mark Leonard

Author(s): Ivan Krastev

Bulgaria: EP Elections a Rehearsal for Early National Elections

23 May 2014

EPIN publication with a general introduction and case studies from 11 Member States (Bulgaria, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, The Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain and the UK) "Between Apathy and Anger: Challenges to the Union from the 201

Author(s): Antoinette Primatarova

Bridge Over Troubled Waters? The Role of the Internationals in Albania

12 October 2012

Publication of Antoinette Primatarova and Dr Johanna Deimel with contributions by Margarita Assenova

view all paper publications

Putin’s Next Playground or the E.U.’s Last Moral Stand?

New York Times, 28 January 2019

Author(s): Ivan Krastev

The Metamorphosis of Central Europe

Project Syndicate, 21 January 2019

Author(s): Ivan Krastev

A European Goes to Trump’s Washington

New York Times, 30 November 2018

Author(s): Ivan Krastev

Steve Bannon’s New Best Friend in Europe

New York Times, 19 August 2018

Author(s): Ivan Krastev

Imitation and Its Discontents

Journal of Democracy, 05 August 2018

Author(s): Ivan Krastev and Stephen Holmes

The Pope vs. the Populists

New York Times, 12 July 2018

Central Europe is a lesson to liberals: don’t be anti-nationalist

The Guardian, 11 July 2018

Author(s): Ivan Krastev

3 Versions of Europe Are Collapsing at the Same Time

Foreign Policy, 10 July 2018

Author(s): Ivan Krastev

view all media publications

Countries Like Bulgaria Need Strong European Leadership

Euinside
24 November 2009
Vessela Tcherneva

 
Published: November 24, 2009 16:15, Adelina Marini, Sofia

The international and internal European reactions after the election of Herman van Rompuy as the first president of the EU and of Catherine Ashton as the first foreign minister continue to be negative and to contain the word "disappointment". Most experts, analysts and politicians have commented that the election of unknown and even incompetent people has weakened the EU globally. In an interview for euinside Vesela Cherneva from the Sofia office of the European Council for Foreign Relations said the election of Van Rompuy and Catherine Ashton was not good for countries like Bulgaria because they need stronger European leadership. However, she recommended that we wait and see whether the new high representatives of the EU will prove as professionals:

euinside: What kind of people have been elected for the new posts, envisaged in the Lisbon Treaty - the president and the foreign minister?

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: Two people have been elected who are not quite popular on the European stage, although Ms. Ashton is known on the international stage because of her being for the last several months a Trade Commissioner. In some sense her name is known in remote places like Korea or China, because they deal with EU on trade issues. But, nevertheless, the EU chose two people who do not have much of an experience in what they have to deal with from now on.

euinside: But to what extent does the Lisbon Treaty give an opportunity for renown and strong people to have their own policy or simply the Treaty restricts the new posts by default?

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: The Lisbon Treaty, in a sense, is a more minimalistic document, compared to the Constitution which was the first proposal, brought down in 2005 from the European agenda. Thanks to its more general phrasing, the Lisbon Treaty gives opportunities for stronger figures or people with a profile, well known in international politics, to have their own vision and follow it. The Treaty was exactly this - so that we have single European foreign policy which would be harder, stronger, more flamboyant and, in a sense, more common.

euinside: The US has already reacted with discontent with this election. Maybe the EU has not managed to fill in the expectations for a strong player on the global stage?

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: Most comments, indeed, are in this direction but they come not only from the EU but from inside Europe as well. But in the end of the day, from now on, time will tell. The Lisbon Treaty has created a possibility for us to create a new European reality and, in fact, these two new positions and the people that took them will show in the future whether this is possible.

euinside: In other words, those people were elected to show whether the experiment will prove successful?

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: Yes. We're talking about the beginning of a new European institution like, for example, the European External Service, the common foreign policy and, in a sense, this is a very daring experiment, so we should see whether this experiment is viable itself. Indeed, this is a great challenge. I think that when two people with almost no experience in foreign policy and in the creation of unity in the EU are given this task, they will start realizing much more how big this responsibility actually is. So, I hope that they will rise to the challenge.

euinside: If we take into account the horse trading before their election, could we expect that they will be something like pawns - that they will depend entirely on the interests of the big EU member states?

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: This is the big question and this is the big risk as well. Unfortunately, now it seems as though the big member states prefer to keep their strong positions in making the European foreign policy. In the same time the Commission, to a large extent, will have its own role, entirely political one, the personal role of the new European foreign minister would be very hard to get through and this is the biggest risk.

euinside: Yes, because Herman van Rompuy himself said that his main function would be to secure compromises. From this point of view wouldn't his lead again to slow decision-making, discussions, etc.?

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: With regard to the function of Rompuy this, indeed, is the larger part of his role. He has to be there to secure compromise. I would pay more attention to Ms. Ashton - to what extent she will prove to be a person, trying to find the smallest resistance or, maybe, to chose what I consider the sense and the spirit of the Lisbon Treaty - to impose a political vision on EU regarding its partners. In fact, her performance would be the touchstone to what extent these appointments are successful or not.

euinside: If, for example Bulgaria would like to intensify the policy towards the region (the Balkans), she must speak to Lady Ashton, is that right?

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: Look, the EU policy in the region cannot go through bilateral relations only. It needs European vision about what the EU considers right to do with its neighbourhood; moreover. The EU's role as a global player will depend on how the Union deals with its neighbours. In this regard, for all smaller countries it would have been and it is very important to have strong leadership in the EU so that those policies are clear and not challenged.

In other words, if there is a single doubt and arguments within the Union regarding what we should do with the Balkans, for countries like Bulgaria would be very hard to pass any European policy. Bulgaria will lure to emphasize on bilateral relations, which I think is not good for the region because the region needs most of all a European perspective. Of course, it also needs good relations with the neighbours but the European perspective is what can really inspire it to move forward and to make a difference with regard to reforms.

euinside: Since we talked about big member states wishing to keep their role in foreign policy, what is the reason behind this - is it a lack of confidence in smaller and new member states or it's just their own interests they follow?

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: In all member states internal politics plays a major role. Recently this role has increased even further. What public opinion with regard to foreign policy thinks is now more and more important in domestic elections, so the leaders of those countries obviously think that they should have a stronger control over foreign policy. In the long term this is not doing any good to the Union, definitely. But, on the other hand, I think that the leaders of big countries are aware that this is not the long-term strategy. In other words, even Germany or France are not convincing enough on the international stage, compared to a political union of 27 which is united around a single foreign policy.

euinside: Could we expect when the term of Van Rompuy ends in two years and a half, the EU to make something like a correction and try a stronger figure?

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: It depends on the performance of Rompuy. The observers say that he is a very good politician in terms of being good at easily reaching consensus in Belgium, which we well know has no easy political scene at all. So, it might prove that such a person is a good choice for the EU but let's see, two years and a half is not a little time.

euinside: Lady Ashton will remain a member of the Commission for the whole 5-year term of the new Commission and, actually, the foreign policy of the Union will depend on her?

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: As far as the member states would allow it.

euinside: When you said that the election was not the greatest idea, I remembered the statement of the Russian president Dmitry Medvedev in Stockholm a short while before the election of Van Rompuy and Catherine Ashton which was very eloquent - it's very good that the Lisbon Treaty will come into force, but anyway Russia will continue to build upon its bilateral relations.

VESSELA TCHERNEVA: This is the long-term game of Russia. Its pursuit to communicate with Berlin, Paris, London and Rome, instead of Brussels, is well known for a long time. In the end of the day it's Russia's interest the EU not to be strong as a community. So, the Russia's policy of "devide and conquer" will continue to be a priority for Moscow. Therefore, given that the common foreign policy towards Russia is the hardest part of the European foreign policy, how the new EU foreign minister is dealing with Russia and how will she position herself on the international stage would be of key importance to see whether we are capable of having common foreign policy at all.

EN-US